March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Final Round

The time has come, the day is near. We have reached the end of March. With it, the end of March Movie Madness. And with that, the end of this tournament. Only four films remain in play, the winners of each of the individual brackets we started out with on March 1. But now, there can only be one. So on Sunday, the final winner will be revealed, but until then, you must cast your vote to determine that winner. Here are the nominees for the best Best Picture winner of all time.

godfather-locations-shooting.jpgThe winner of Bracket A was The Godfather, the first of Francis Ford Coppola’s acclaimed trilogy. Boasting an Oscar-winning performance from Marlon Brando as the titular character, Vito Corleone, the film is really about Vito’s son Michael (Al Pacino) as he walks the line between supporting his family of mafioso and becoming one himself. While the first film only won three Academy Awards, including Best Adapted Screenplay, The Godfather Part II (which also won Bracket D) was an awards juggernaut, taking home six Oscars as it chronicled Vito’s origins from Sicily and Michael’s rapid descent into darkness.

gettyimages-526897836_wide-beabf41e7aabe223a89e88da93c413396268d150-s900-c85Bracket B was won by Casablanca, a rather interesting conundrum by Oscar standards. Not only did this film only win three Academy Awards, but it has an interesting slight with its year of release. While the film is so often credited as a 1942 release, it was actually the Best Picture winner of 1944, celebrating the best films of 1943. What this proves is that one of the greatest films of the early days of Hollywood was still a victim of the limited release system that plagues the rest of the world today. But hey, that was before studios used that to qualify for Oscars sooner rather than later, so this January 1943 release also proved that you don’t need an elaborate awards campaign to win Oscars (though it does help nowadays), rather you just need a great movie.

rotkFinally, the winner of Bracket C was The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, the epic conclusion to Peter Jackson’s fantasy trilogy. While all three entries of this tale of elves, dwarfs, and men were nominated for Best Picture and took home a number of awards, The Return of the King holds the distinction of being one of three films to win eleven Academy Awards (the other two being Ben-Hur and Titanic), as well as the only of the three to have won every single Oscar it was nominated for. Because of its excellence in all elements of fantasy cinema, as well as film in general, it remains a game changer in Oscar history that even the most recent Best Picture winner cannot live up to.

And there you have it, the four finalists. This time the polls will close on Saturday at midnight, so don’t delay in voting. If you haven’t seen any of these movies, I encourage you to take a day and catch up on them. If you’re all caught up, click the link below and pick your favorite of the bunch.

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SZFVLHN

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Semi-Final Round

Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 12.19.36 AM.pngWe’ve reached that point in the tournament when most of the expected contenders have started to match up against each other. The underdogs have fallen against the behemoths, and we now have eight Best Pictures left. After this week, four of these films will move on to the final round, and only one of them will be crowned champion of March Movie Madness. The Godfather and its first sequel are both still in this race, and both will face their hardest adversaries yet in Titanic and The Silence of the Lambs. Meanwhile, Annie Hall famously beat an epic fantasy film for Best Picture in 1977, but can it repeat its success today against The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King? But I suppose the toughest match this round will be between Casablanca and Schindler’s List, and it’s not exactly a black-and-white match-up despite both films having little-to-no color. We’re going to lose some iconic films in this round, but this will be a true test as to how iconic they are compared to the present competition. Vote now and secure the future of your favorite film before it is left in the past!

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/T3CPXB7

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Round 3

Round 3 has begun, and things are starting to get interesting now. Some of last week’s surprise juggernauts took a dive against their competitors, but a few of them took down the giants of their brackets.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.41.56 PMIn Bracket A, we saw Gone with the Wind get blown away by The French Connection, and Braveheart defeated Gladiator. Both winners power their way to round three where The French Connection tries to slow down Titanic, and Braveheart is targeted for a hit by The Godfather. I think the expected winners will take it home this week, but if there’s anything this tournament has shown us, it’s that anything can happen.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.42.06 PMMeanwhile in Bracket B, it’s become clear that more people need to see the works of David Lean, as for a second week in a row his film got trampled by Dances with Wolves. The Kevin Costner vehicle certainly has more mileage than you’d expect, but its current destination is in Casablanca. It’s been a great run, and two top-tier films were unseated last week, but it’s gonna be tough for Dances with Wolves to move forward to the next round.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.42.14 PMBracket C went pretty much as expected, with the surprise juggernaut Gandhi, having survived far longer than expected, was caught and jailed by In the Heat of the Night. The murder mystery starring Sidney Poitier now squares off against Annie Hall, while a battle of epic proportions takes place between Ben-Hur and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.53.46 PM.pngBracket D has also had some significant upsets, starting with Forrest Gump outrunning The Sound of Music. On the other side of the ring, Rocky went the distance against It Happened One Night. Now these two heartfelt classics might get their hearts shot at or eaten as they go up against The Godfather Part II and The Silence of the Lambs. It’s about to become a bloodbath for somebody, but that’s what this tournament is about, right?

For the sake of making it easier to vote, I’ve condensed all four brackets into one poll, so hopefully it’ll take less time for everyone to vote. This is also convenient for me now that we’ve whittled through enough films to fit all the questions into one bracket. So now that that’s been taken care of, get out there and vote!

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/L2NT7TF

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Round 2

A week into March and round one of March Movie Madness is over. Much like the Oscars this year, it mostly went as expected, with most of the 32 eliminated films serving as obvious cannon fodder. But then there were a few surprises along the way, some that legitimately shocked me as to how popular they are.

Screen Shot 2018-03-08 at 10.59.51 AM.pngThe first big surprise is The Sting beating out On the Waterfront. The Elia Kazan-directed film is widely considered an all-time great, but it just couldn’t take the beating dealt by the prototype for Ocean’s Eleven. Now in round 2, it faces off against James Cameron’s historical epic Titanic, one of only three films in history to win eleven Academy Awards. Will The Sting sink Titanic, or has this operation come to a halt?

The other big surprise in Bracket A comes in the form of Braveheart upsetting All Quiet on the Western Front. Turns out Hacksaw Ridge may have restored audience faith in Mel Gibson just as much as critic and Academy faith, enough for it to pull ahead against one of the first great Best Picture winners. It now stares down the battlefield against another battle epic, Ridley Scott’s Gladiator. Between the two mighty warriors William Wallace and Maximus Decimus Meridius, only one will live to fight the next battle.

Screen Shot 2018-03-08 at 11.00.12 AMThe surprises continue in Bracket B, where the Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men took on Alfred Hitchcock’s Rebecca, proving that sometimes two directors are better than one. But now their relentless pic goes to Casablanca in round 2, and only one of them will get on the plane to round three. But the real shocker here is Kevin Costner’s Dances with Wolves, a film that is wildly reviled for winning against GoodFellas, beating David Lean’s war epic The Bridge on the River Kwai. While this was truly a surprise, Lean may yet get his revenge with his other magnum opus, Lawrence of Arabia. The terrain ahead is treacherous for both, but one of them will cross into the next round.

Screen Shot 2018-03-08 at 11.00.25 AMNot too many surprises here, as most of the big winners (Annie HallBen-HurThe Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King) were expected. But here we have perhaps the biggest surprise of the entire first round. All About Eve, one of Hollywood’s favorites (and one of mine), lost to the film that stole Best Picture from E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial. That infamous film is Gandhi, one of only a few films that the Academy wishes it could take back the Oscar from, and even its own director admitted almost immediately that Steven Spielberg’s masterpiece should’ve won. But though the man was a pacifist, Gandhi is known for stealing awards and victories. Its current competition is In the Heat of the Night, but this one really could go either way. But if Gandhi somehow makes it to the next round, its journey will become that much harder.

Screen Shot 2018-03-08 at 11.00.34 AMAnd finally we come to Bracket D, where things more-or-less went as expected. You had some upsets, like Forrest Gump out-pacing An American in ParisRocky out-lasting The Apartment, and The Deer Hunter out-shooting The Hurt Locker. But none of these were massive surprises as seen in the other three brackets. Now for round 2, Forrest Gump races over the hills against The Sound of MusicRocky goes one-on-one with It Happened One Night, and The Deer Hunter will be tormented by The Silence of the Lambs. Those that weren’t cannon fodder before will likely become cannon fodder now, but anything can happen. After all, it’s not called March Movie Madness for nothing.

Don’t like some of these results? Then what are you waiting for? Go to the links below and vote up the films you want to see advance to the next round. As before, the polls will be open for one week, so don’t delay!

Bracket A: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KFRYBWV

Bracket B: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KFNMTM3

Bracket C: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KF3KBNY

Bracket D: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KF35NKX

Oscar Commentary 2017: Ranking the Best Picture Winners (2007-2016)

There’s always a strong debate on whether the Oscars are truly relevant in showcasing the overall quality of a film, particularly with the Best Picture winner. This is especially true in recent years, as many have called the Academy’s recent choices “safe”. We could argue that all day, but I’d like to think that they’re still at least picking good movies, even if some of them haven’t aged well. With that being said, let’s take a look at the last ten movies to win Best Picture and see which ones have stood the test of time or faded away from public consciousness. I will also briefly leave my pick on what should have won that year out of the nominated films, so you won’t see mentions of such films as The Dark Knight or Drive, as they were not nominated. If you guys like it, I’ll see about doing this again next year with the upcoming Best Picture winner in mind. Until then, the list is as follows:

the-kings-speech-533x40010. The King’s Speech – This is the very definition of an inspirational film, and I do mean that in the best way. Colin Firth (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) gives the performance of his career as King George VI, finding all the best places to insert Bertie’s signature stammer in the screenplay. Under the hands of a more gutsy director, this could have been a true tour-de-force film that deserved to win Best Picture. But under the direction of Tom Hooper (Les Misérables), it just feels rather safe. However, despite it being at the bottom of my list, this is by no means a bad movie, and it still holds a special place in my heart as one of the tools I used to overcome my own stammer. Again, the very definition of an inspirational film, just not much beyond that.

Should have won: The Social Network

TheArtistMovie.jpg9. The Artist – Another safe movie, but there is a significant difference between The Artist and The King’s Speech, and that difference is what ultimately resulted in the former ranking higher on this list. Instead of being safe but inspirational like The King’s SpeechThe Artist lacks in inspiration but makes up for it by actually taking advantage of its craft. Okay, it doesn’t do that much, but this almost-completely silent film does have a couple jarring scenes with sound that are used to great effect, each showing the turmoil and development of its protagonist. The end result may not have been spectacular, but the ambition is definitely there. Sometimes, that’s enough to get you a leg up over someone else.

Should have won: Hugo

spotlight-review.png8. Spotlight – Most people might’ve forgotten that this movie won Best Picture. While that may be mostly because it came on the heels of Leonardo DiCaprio (Inception) finally winning an Oscar, I think part of the reason is how stale and unmoving it is. In some ways, that’s the film’s biggest weakness, as it’s hard to get invested in a story and characters when the story and characters themselves aren’t invested in the story and characters. But that may also be its biggest strength, as one of the major themes of the film is that the pedophile priests were in plain sight and everybody knew about them, but for one reason or another they were too afraid to say anything. Whichever way you look at it, this is definitely a film that lends itself to airing on TV, and I guess someone had the bright idea that it was meant for bigger things.

Should have won: The Revenant

poster-for-film-argo-e1354785600715.jpg7. Argo – This is the only reason I still consider Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri to be a prominent Best Picture contender this year, because very few movies have won Best Picture without even being nominated for Best Director. While many may attribute this to the film being about Hollywood swooping in and saving the day, let’s not forget that this is still a well-made thriller with some genuinely suspenseful sequences, particularly the opening raid on the American Embassy in Iran and a marketplace tour towards the end of the second act. My only real issue is that the supporting cast isn’t terribly memorable, and they’re the people who we’re supposed to care about whether or not they’re rescued. That’s why it’s not higher on this list, but it’s still worth a viewing or two nonetheless.

Should have won: Life of Pi

birdman-poster.jpg6. Birdman – Yet another film about Hollywood, though this one does take a bit of a stab at it. The theme of the film seems to be rebellion, and this is mostly shown through Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) and his daughter Sam (Emma Stone), the latter rebelling against her father who is rebelling against Hollywood and superhero films, each having provided a lot for the well-being of those under them in this rebel cycle. Basically, everybody’s biting the hand that feeds them, but the film also tries to show how that hand is also choking them, which makes us ask if either action is ever justified. The long-take (or illusion thereof) by cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki (Gravity) further illustrates this rebellion against the myriads of quick cuts seen in most superhero movies, and major props to the production designers for keeping the sets filled with something interesting to look at the entire time. While it may not soar like its title character, its wings are still powerful enough to get airborne.

Should have won: Boyhood

12-years-a-slave-poster-copy.jpg5. 12 Years a Slave – You all knew we were gonna get to this one sooner or later. You don’t want to talk about it, just like you didn’t want it to win. Well, I’m with you, but I’m the one writing this blog so we’re gonna talk about it anyway. This is a cold and unforgiving portrait of slavery in pre-Civil War America, even more so when Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) had tasted freedom his whole life. As painful as it is to watch, a lot of that is thanks to the actors and how much range they bring to their performances, particularly Chiwetel Ejiofor (The Martian) and Michael Fassbender (Inglourious Basterds). They prove that the calmest scenes can be just as unsettling as anything else when the setting is this relentlessly cruel. There, now that we’re done, we can be happy, right?

Should have won: The Wolf of Wall Street

130217moonlight.jpg4. Moonlight – It’s no mistake, Moonlight just barely missed out on the top three. As much as anyone can relate to this story, especially as someone who spent years living in and exploring South Florida, much of this film’s longevity will be because of the manner in which it was presented with the Best Picture Oscar. But while it may be too artsy for casual viewers’ tastes, it’s still a great film that tells a sprawling epic on an intimate scale. If you’ve been to South Beach, you immediately recognize it when one of the film’s key scenes begins there, even though it may look like just any other beach. It’s a film about a journey, which is what most movies are anyway, but this journey is unique to the character of Chiron and unique throughout cinema, and somehow we all saw ourselves in this journey. And that is no mistake.

Should have won: La La Land

DQmapHDoaoSMCFF2jEM7m9aXiSKU7anWGSeH7GXwsVd8da4.jpeg3. No Country for Old Men – Like Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem), we’re starting to creep into darker territory here, and also where the films become more deserving of a Best Picture win. While I would not have voted for it to win, this is still a fantastic effort by the then-overdue Coen Brothers (True Grit), who infused their signature wit into a lawless and desolate wasteland that makes the Old West look like a rompin’ good time. All of the actors give it their all, but it really is Javier Bardem (Skyfall) who steals the show and everything else out from under everyone. It’s the kind of movie that slowly stalks you after you’re done watching it and appears in your thoughts when you least expect it, even though you’ve been anticipating its arrival the whole time.

Should have won: There Will Be Blood

Slumdog-Millionaire.jpg2. Slumdog Millionaire – If we don’t count the two or three or four movies that should’ve been nominated for Best Picture that year but weren’t, the Academy made the right choice picking this movie. Even if we do count them, there’s still that argument to be made. Danny Boyle (127 Hours) doesn’t shy away from showing the darker side of the slums in India, but at the same time he borrows a few tactics from Bollywood filmmaking to craft this love story that spans across time, distance, and game shows. There are plenty of dark moments, but it’s ultimately satisfying at the end, and the music by A. R. Rahman (Lagaan) fits the mood throughout the entire film. It’s a feel good movie that gives you every reason and desire to feel good. Whether you think it’s outclassed or not, it’s still one for the ages.

Should have won: Slumdog Millionaire

hurt_locker_poster_m.jpg1. The Hurt Locker – Finally at the top, we come to one of the best and most challenging war films of the 21st Century, one whose screenplay runs with the traditional hero’s journey but then flips it on its head. Kathryn Bigelow (Zero Dark Thirty) understood what this script was going for, and had the film shot with as much realism in order to normalize the experience of war to the audience, which is exactly the perspective we need to be in to understand the decisions made by the protagonist. For him, war is the normal world, and this is important in understanding the character and the culture we live in where we have become so desensitized to war and violence that we can’t get enough of it, almost like an addiction that we rush back to every chance we get. It’s a haunting and realistically fresh take on familiar themes and stories, but that makes it all the better because of it, and that’s why it’s the best Best Picture winner of the last decade.

Should have won: The Hurt Locker

So what have we learned? Aside from a few outliers, the safe films did drift towards the bottom of the list, while the upper half was dominated by darker films. Even when we had moments of happiness in the top half or melancholy in the bottom half, it was still balanced out (and then some) by the dominating emotion of the film. But the better films are generally more challenging, whether they challenge the audience or the filmmaking craft. Having said that, all of these films are still worth a watch. Maybe you’ll get something out of them, maybe you won’t. They all seemed to have resonated with someone if they managed to win the title of Best Picture.

Oscar Commentary 2017: Roger Deakins

Director-of-Photography-Cover.jpg
Roger Deakins prepares yet another iconic shot.

If you’re a film buff like I am, you’ve probably heard the name Roger Deakins before. Even if you haven’t, chances are you’ve seen his cinematography in films like The Shawshank RedemptionFargo, and Skyfall. As one of the best and most well-known DP’s (director of photography) in the filmmaking business, it’s easy to see why he’s been nominated for fourteen Academy Awards for Best Cinematography. But like many great artists, he has continued contributing to hit after hit after hit without ever winning an Oscar. This is not uncommon in Hollywood. Many great directors like Steven Spielberg and Martin Scorsese went through most of their careers and several nominations without winning anything, and the same can be said for actors like Leonardo DiCaprio. So when the time has come and Deakins finally has a shot at winning an Oscar for his stellar work on Blade Runner 2049, we must ask the same question we think but are too afraid to ask when every great artist gets to this point: does he deserve it?

FARGO
Marge Gunderson (Frances McDormand) sees the car in front of her, but Roger Deakins sees the whole picture in Fargo.

Now since Roger Deakins has earned fourteen Oscar nominations to date, there have been fourteen chances so far for him to win. I’m going to examine five or six of those examples and figure out if he has deserved to win before, and if he deserves to win now. The most important thing to remember about the Oscars is that whether the politics come into play or not, it’s a competitive race. But it’s unique among competitive races in that you’re not actively playing against anyone. It’s kinda like figure skating in that sense. You can’t really one-up your opponent unless you pull a Tonya Harding, but given the nature of film production that’s almost impossible to do when you get this close to the awards season and the movies have already been released. You can give the performance of your career or craft the most amazing shots you’ve ever composed, but none of that matters if someone else does it even a little better. Voting statistics are never released, so it’s impossible to know for sure how close Deakins or anyone has come to winning in the past. But we can compare his work to the actual winners, and then we’ll see who actually deserved to win that year.

shawshank
Roger Deakins captures Andy Dufresne’s (Tim Robbins) freedom in The Shawshank Redemption.

For this first example, we’ll go back to the beginning of Deakins’ streak with the Academy: The Shawshank Redemption. This is a movie that was robbed of nearly every Oscar it was nominated for, and even a few where it was left out of the race completely. But one of the things that helped it stand the test of time so well was Deakins’ cinematography. There are so many iconic shots throughout this movie that it’s hard to keep track of them all. But more than that, he understands what the audience would think to look at, and then highlights that while keeping important plot elements visible enough to be seen, but not as the main focus of the shot until they come back later. The winner that year was Legends of the Fall. Be honest, have you even heard of that movie? Has it lasted in the public eye? Has it played on TV for over two decades like The Shawshank Redemption? This is a movie that bombed at the box office and missed out completely in the Oscar race, but somehow managed to find an audience and stake its claim as one of the greatest movies of all time. Roger Deakins played a huge part in that, and absolutely should’ve won an Oscar here.

01
Through Roger Deakins’ lens, we see a dead body in the opening shot of True Grit.

But while he peaked early, he still kept doing great work. His collaborations with Joel and Ethan Coen have found him a lot of success in the Oscar race, particularly with films like Fargo and True Grit. His wide shots took full advantage of the lighting and atmosphere surrounding the actors, creating grim environments that you want to dive deeper into and explore. Fargo lost to The English Patient, and while we all have many passionate things to say about that movie, it was also beautifully shot. Should it have beat Fargo for cinematography? That’s debatable, but it was clearly a closer race in my mind than his previous loss. True Grit lost to Wally Pfister’s work on Inception. Are we really gonna argue with this one? Pfister made the impossible look possible, even if only in dreams. Despite the extensive visual effects used in that movie, the VFX artists still had wonderfully inventive shots to work with.

ncfomsil
Only Roger Deakins knows exactly where Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) is in No Country for Old Men.

But the biggest one to many people seems to be No Country for Old Men, which lost to There Will Be Blood. To be honest, I vote for Robert Elswit on this one, especially if you’ve seen the opening scenes of his film. The camerawork has to play a huge part in telling the story since it takes so long for anyone to say a word in this movie, and yet thanks to him and Daniel Day-Lewis, we understand everything that’s going on in Daniel Plainview’s mind. But I don’t think that’s why Deakins lost this one. I think he lost because he had another film in the race that year: The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. Because he had two films in the race, he likely split votes with himself, and that could’ve put even Atonement ahead of him. Remember, it’s a competition. And while you can’t one-up your opponent, you can very easily sabotage yourself by putting too many credits in the race.

roger_deakins_skyfall
James Bond (Daniel Craig) fights what he could have been and what he is through Roger Deakins’ cinematography in Skyfall.

But one of the things we can infer so far is that after Fargo, other DP’s were showing up more than he was. He had many nominations in between, but they lost to films like TitanicCrouching Tiger, Hidden DragonThe Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, and Slumdog Millionaire. These are some of the examples where his work was not as memorable compared to the competition. But that all changed when he joined the crew for Skyfall. As an action film, the expectations were for fast-paced editing and camerawork that was hard to make out, but Deakins brought artistry and fluidity to the shots. Yes, some of the edits were quick, but it was always going from one steady shot to another, and Deakins’ mastery of the camera was still present in all of them. At first glance, it seemed like this would finally be his year, and I would’ve loved to see that happen. But then Claudio Miranda took it home for his work on Life of Pi, which is kinda like Inception in terms of being very reliant on visual effects, but at the same time they also had beautiful shots to work with. While I might prefer Skyfall‘s cinematography, it’s understandable to see how Deakins lost this one.

screen-shot-2017-05-08-at-1-09-47-pm
Joi (Ana de Armas) bestows love on K (Ryan Gosling) just as the Academy may bestow love upon Roger Deakins for Blade Runner 2049.

So now we come to the present. After losing the Oscar to Emmanuel Lubezki three times in a row (GravityBirdmanThe Revenant), Roger Deakins is now the frontrunner to win Best Cinematography for Blade Runner 2049. For the most part, his competition isn’t that noteworthy, but he is once again up against a Christopher Nolan film: Dunkirk. There are many technical aspects to this film that, if even a hair off, would’ve brought the overall product down immensely. But they all work together in a truly experiential harmony, starting with Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography. Whether you feel like you’re trapped on the beach or inside a Navy ship, the camerawork builds constant suspense throughout the entire runtime and never lets up. Roger Deakins brought us back to the world of Blade Runner, and even expanding on the world thanks to modern camera technology. But unlike Skyfall where he brought something new to the franchise, all he did was expand on the work of Jordan Cronenweth, the DP for the original Blade Runner. So while Deakins probably will take home an Oscar next month after fourteen nominations, but does he deserve it over Dunkirk?

big-lebowski-jeff-bridges
The Dude (Jeff Bridges) does not abide The Big Lebowski missing out on a Best Cinematography nomination for Roger Deakins.

If Roger Deakins did win the Oscar, would it be his win? Or would it be more akin to an Honorary Academy Award celebrating his entire body of work? Whatever the case may be, this is a guy who genuinely deserves an Oscar for something. And while I don’t think this should be his year, he will definitely have at least one on his shelf before he’s done.

Oscar Commentary 2017: LGBTQ Cinema

landscape-1505307489-call-me-by-your-name.jpg
Timotheé Chalamet and Armie Hammer star in Call Me By Your Name, nominated for four Oscars: Best Picture, Best Actor (Chalamet), Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Original Song (“Mystery of Love”).

We see it pretty much every year. A movie about a gay or lesbian couple gets nominated for a bunch of Oscars. Some say it’s a touching portrait of romance that hasn’t been explored yet, but is that true anymore if we see these films at the Oscars every single year? Some say they keep getting nominated because it’s the politically-correct thing to do, but should the artistry behind many of these films be denied? Some say they’re just good movies, but are they all really? And do all of them actually get major nominations?

151118-bugbee-carol-tease_e2x3bg
Rooney Mara and Cate Blanchett were nominated for Oscars for their work in Carol, which was also nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Cinematography, and Best Costume Design.

And this brings me to my first argument about the subject matter: Carol (2015). If you saw this movie, you know this much to be certain: Cate Blanchett commands every scene with confidence and grace and makes everyone of either sex fall in love with her, Rooney Mara perfectly captures the innocence of a young woman discovering her sexuality, and everything about the production from the cinematography to the set and costume design creates a bleak but colorful world that encapsulates 1950s America. In short, this is a great movie that deserves more praise than it got. So, why was it snubbed of a Best Picture nomination over lesser films like Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) (more on that piece of trash another time. I said another time!)? If politics had anything to do with it, it would’ve gotten the nomination for sure. But I have a different theory that might also explain why so many LGBTQ films have been getting nominations in the last decade: the sliding scale system.

maxresdefault (8)
Annette Bening and Julianne Moore star in The Kids Are Alright, nominated for four Oscars: Best Picture, Best Actress (Bening), Best Supporting Actor (Mark Ruffalo), and Best Original Screenplay.

I’ll try to make this short, mostly because even the best accountants I know could never explain this no matter how hard they tried, but there’s a lot of math that comes from the Best Picture ballots of each Academy voter that determines the number of Best Picture nominees between five and ten. It usually changes every year. My point is, instead of allowing more blockbuster films like The Dark Knight (2008) to make the cut, it has incentivized studios to launch even more rigorous Oscar campaigns for smaller movies that might otherwise not make any money at the box office. And while I don’t have access to the exact numbers for Oscar voting, I can offer analysis based on what other nominations many of these movies are getting.

the-danish-girl-eddie-redmayne-alicia-vikander
Alicia Vikander and Eddie Redmayne were nominated for Oscars for their work in The Danish Girl, with the former winning Best Supporting Actress.

For example, while Carol was not nominated for Best Picture, it was recognized for Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara in Best Actress and Supporting Actress respectively, the latter being a bull$#!% move if you ask me (more on that when it’s relevant). That same year, we also saw The Danish Girl (2015) nominated for Best Actor for Eddie Redmayne, and winning Best Supporting Actress for Alicia Vikander (more bull$#!%). Also a LGBTQ film, also not nominated for Best Picture. And both films fought hard with their campaigns on the precursor awards, with Carol especially dominating many nomination counts. What ultimately happened was the sliding scale set the Best Picture count to eight, shutting both films out.

dbc-fp-082213-0318_wide-523535abed8cb4ec007ca4a92f201b47002419d8-s900-c85
Jared Leto won Best Supporting Actor for Dallas Buyers Club, which also won Best Actor (Matthew McConaughey) and Best Makeup and Hairstyling.

So that’s what happens when the sliding scale shuts out LGBTQ films entirely. What about when they do get nominated for Best Picture? Films like Dallas Buyers Club (2013) and Call Me By Your Name (2017) cover similar subject matter and made the Best Picture cut, both in years where there were nine nominees. What does this have to do with anything? A lot, actually. Best Picture is the only category that is able to have more than five nominees, and the one category that almost always ties itself to Best Picture is Best Director. Especially in the age of the sliding scale, if your film is nominated for Best Director, it’s most likely nominated for Best Picture as well. What’s interesting to note is that while the aforementioned films, along with The Kids Are Alright (2010), were nominated for Best Picture in their respective years, they all missed out on Best Director. Which means the sliding scale was probably the only reason these films got in. So, does it ever actually happen for LGBTQ films to make it big at the Oscars? Well, yes.

1028screeningmoonlight01
Moonlight won Oscars for Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor (Mahershala Ali), and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Once-in-awhile you’ll see this kind of movie get nominated for most of the major awards, and maybe even win Best Picture like Moonlight (2016). But it should also be noted that not only did Barry Jenkins lose Best Director to Damien Chazelle for La La Land (2016), the film arguably also capitalized on the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag that had been going around for a couple years prior, and here comes a film about a poor gay black kid from Miami that takes all the gold. If there’s one thing the Academy loves more than a socially-relevant topic, it’s multiple socially-relevant topics. There’s also The Imitation Game (2014), securing nominations for Best Picture and Best Director, and just like the aforementioned Moonlight, winning Best Adapted Screenplay. But that was also a WWII movie which, again, Oscar campaigns can’t get enough of. Seriously, Dunkirk (2017) AND Darkest Hour (2017)? Do we really need both in the same year?

imitation-game.jpg
Keira Knightley and Benedict Cumberbatch were nominated for Oscars for The Imitation Game, which won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay.

But one other thing that those two films have in common is they take more advantage of the art and science of filmmaking than, say, Call Me By Your NameThe Imitation Game is edited together like a puzzle that you have to solve, the order of each flashback or flashforward planned very carefully so the story still flows organically and reveals come naturally to both the audience and the other characters. Moonlight took risks in its cinematography and music, using a cerebral tone to get its audience into Chiron’s mindset. While I don’t think all of its risks paid off (ex. slo-mo reverse shot), it still went above and beyond the generic shot composition most films of its type would’ve attempted.

1483984758_focus_features_brokeback_mountain_heath_ledger_jake_gyllenhaal_anne_hatheway_michelle_williams_bg3
Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger were nominated for Oscars for Brokeback Mountain, which won Best Original Score, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Director (Ang Lee).

And going back years further before the sliding scale, you see these films less and less, with the occasional nominations and wins for films like Brokeback Mountain (2005), Milk (2008), and Philadelphia (1993). But that was back when we still only had five nominees for Best Picture, and also when the subject was far more controversial than it is today. So, what can we gather from all this? That politics has everything to do with these films getting nominations, but also nothing at all. Campaigns are everything, but the current system is so screwed up that the politics are either completely obvious and/or don’t matter. The LGBTQ community can say they have victory by getting Best Picture nominated films, but they really don’t mean much when they’re obviously included just to fill a quota. Seriously though, what was up with snubbing Carol?