March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Final Round

The time has come, the day is near. We have reached the end of March. With it, the end of March Movie Madness. And with that, the end of this tournament. Only four films remain in play, the winners of each of the individual brackets we started out with on March 1. But now, there can only be one. So on Sunday, the final winner will be revealed, but until then, you must cast your vote to determine that winner. Here are the nominees for the best Best Picture winner of all time.

godfather-locations-shooting.jpgThe winner of Bracket A was The Godfather, the first of Francis Ford Coppola’s acclaimed trilogy. Boasting an Oscar-winning performance from Marlon Brando as the titular character, Vito Corleone, the film is really about Vito’s son Michael (Al Pacino) as he walks the line between supporting his family of mafioso and becoming one himself. While the first film only won three Academy Awards, including Best Adapted Screenplay, The Godfather Part II (which also won Bracket D) was an awards juggernaut, taking home six Oscars as it chronicled Vito’s origins from Sicily and Michael’s rapid descent into darkness.

gettyimages-526897836_wide-beabf41e7aabe223a89e88da93c413396268d150-s900-c85Bracket B was won by Casablanca, a rather interesting conundrum by Oscar standards. Not only did this film only win three Academy Awards, but it has an interesting slight with its year of release. While the film is so often credited as a 1942 release, it was actually the Best Picture winner of 1944, celebrating the best films of 1943. What this proves is that one of the greatest films of the early days of Hollywood was still a victim of the limited release system that plagues the rest of the world today. But hey, that was before studios used that to qualify for Oscars sooner rather than later, so this January 1943 release also proved that you don’t need an elaborate awards campaign to win Oscars (though it does help nowadays), rather you just need a great movie.

rotkFinally, the winner of Bracket C was The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, the epic conclusion to Peter Jackson’s fantasy trilogy. While all three entries of this tale of elves, dwarfs, and men were nominated for Best Picture and took home a number of awards, The Return of the King holds the distinction of being one of three films to win eleven Academy Awards (the other two being Ben-Hur and Titanic), as well as the only of the three to have won every single Oscar it was nominated for. Because of its excellence in all elements of fantasy cinema, as well as film in general, it remains a game changer in Oscar history that even the most recent Best Picture winner cannot live up to.

And there you have it, the four finalists. This time the polls will close on Saturday at midnight, so don’t delay in voting. If you haven’t seen any of these movies, I encourage you to take a day and catch up on them. If you’re all caught up, click the link below and pick your favorite of the bunch.

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SZFVLHN

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Semi-Final Round

Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 12.19.36 AM.pngWe’ve reached that point in the tournament when most of the expected contenders have started to match up against each other. The underdogs have fallen against the behemoths, and we now have eight Best Pictures left. After this week, four of these films will move on to the final round, and only one of them will be crowned champion of March Movie Madness. The Godfather and its first sequel are both still in this race, and both will face their hardest adversaries yet in Titanic and The Silence of the Lambs. Meanwhile, Annie Hall famously beat an epic fantasy film for Best Picture in 1977, but can it repeat its success today against The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King? But I suppose the toughest match this round will be between Casablanca and Schindler’s List, and it’s not exactly a black-and-white match-up despite both films having little-to-no color. We’re going to lose some iconic films in this round, but this will be a true test as to how iconic they are compared to the present competition. Vote now and secure the future of your favorite film before it is left in the past!

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/T3CPXB7

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films – Round 3

Round 3 has begun, and things are starting to get interesting now. Some of last week’s surprise juggernauts took a dive against their competitors, but a few of them took down the giants of their brackets.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.41.56 PMIn Bracket A, we saw Gone with the Wind get blown away by The French Connection, and Braveheart defeated Gladiator. Both winners power their way to round three where The French Connection tries to slow down Titanic, and Braveheart is targeted for a hit by The Godfather. I think the expected winners will take it home this week, but if there’s anything this tournament has shown us, it’s that anything can happen.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.42.06 PMMeanwhile in Bracket B, it’s become clear that more people need to see the works of David Lean, as for a second week in a row his film got trampled by Dances with Wolves. The Kevin Costner vehicle certainly has more mileage than you’d expect, but its current destination is in Casablanca. It’s been a great run, and two top-tier films were unseated last week, but it’s gonna be tough for Dances with Wolves to move forward to the next round.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.42.14 PMBracket C went pretty much as expected, with the surprise juggernaut Gandhi, having survived far longer than expected, was caught and jailed by In the Heat of the Night. The murder mystery starring Sidney Poitier now squares off against Annie Hall, while a battle of epic proportions takes place between Ben-Hur and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

Screen Shot 2018-03-15 at 5.53.46 PM.pngBracket D has also had some significant upsets, starting with Forrest Gump outrunning The Sound of Music. On the other side of the ring, Rocky went the distance against It Happened One Night. Now these two heartfelt classics might get their hearts shot at or eaten as they go up against The Godfather Part II and The Silence of the Lambs. It’s about to become a bloodbath for somebody, but that’s what this tournament is about, right?

For the sake of making it easier to vote, I’ve condensed all four brackets into one poll, so hopefully it’ll take less time for everyone to vote. This is also convenient for me now that we’ve whittled through enough films to fit all the questions into one bracket. So now that that’s been taken care of, get out there and vote!

Voting: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/L2NT7TF

Oscar Commentary 2017: The Results

Jordan-Peele-Oscar-Win-History-Get-Out-Movie.jpg
Jordan Peele became the first African-American to win Best Original Screenplay for his directorial debut, Get Out.

So the Oscars happened. While there were certainly a few pleasant surprises, for the most part they went as expected. If the number one predictions didn’t win, it was always the dark horses. It was easy to narrow it down to two deserving films for each category, but in the spirit of the Academy Awards, there can only be one. A number of films won one Oscar, such as Call Me By Your Name (Best Adapted Screenplay) or Phantom Thread (Best Costume Design), but we’ll mostly focus on those that won multiple awards. So in the spirit of keeping this article shorter than the ceremony, here are the results of the 90th Academy Awards.

coco-remember-me-oscars-video.png
“Remember Me” was a little overblown on the Oscars stage.

Unsurprisingly, Coco won the Oscars for Best Animated Feature and Best Original Song for “Remember Me”. It’s a powerful song that, no matter how it’s played, resonates with you in some way. And as the centerpiece of a Pixar movie, it’s pretty easy to see why this movie took home two Academy Awards.

thumbnail_26214
Blade Runner 2049 ended Roger Deakins’ nomination streak with his first win for Best Cinematography.

Also a recipient of two Oscars is Blade Runner 2049, which won Best Cinematography for Roger Deakins and Best Visual Effects. The VFX work in this film was absolutely stunning, staying true to the look of the original while also advancing the world and aesthetic. The cinematography also helped bring that aesthetic to life. The only downside to this win is that War for the Planet of the Apes ended a trilogy of revolutionary motion capture effects without a single Oscar to its name.

Frances_McDormand_oscars_050318.JPG
Frances McDormand won her second Best Actress Oscar for her performance in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.

But the big surprise is that Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri only won two acting awards: Best Supporting Actor for Sam Rockwell and Best Actress for Frances McDormand, gunning for round two onstage. McDormand’s speech was a riot, mobilizing the masses to stand up for themselves, but it wasn’t enough to keep Get Out (a much more deserving film) from stealing Best Original Screenplay.

m3wsvs8iqh501
Dunkirk not only won three Oscars, but it scored Christopher Nolan his first Best Director nomination.

Dunkirk took home three awards: Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, and Best Film Editing. The sound work on both fronts, especially when mixed with Hans Zimmer’s Oscar-losing score, transported you to the beaches of Dunkirk, the seas of the English Channel, and the skies above with the RAF airplanes. The editing also kept the pace flowing at a consistent and tension-filled rate through the three different settings. Despite many believing Baby Driver should have won, these awards are very well-deserved for Dunkirk and I can’t wait to see what Christopher Nolan offers the Oscars next time he directs a movie. 

8CC169EA-6641-4FEE-B0F0-C703F1FB7CBC_w1023_r1_s.jpg
The cast and crew of The Shape of Water, led by Oscar-winning director Guillermo del Toro, accepts the 90th Academy Award for Best Picture.

And finally, the big winner of the night, The Shape of Water deservedly won Best Original Score for Alexandre Desplat, his second after The Grand Budapest Hotel three years ago. Even more so, it rightly won Best Production Design, Best Director for Guillermo del Toro, and the coveted Best Picture Oscar. Though many, myself included, thought Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri would be the big winner, del Toro’s period fantasy proved us naysayers wrong and pleasantly surprised us with four wins (should’ve been at least five for Best Costume Design). This may be a sign of change in the ever-evolving Academy as they recognize horror and fantasy films more as winners instead of just nominees, but we can only wait and see how the Oscars continue to operate in the coming years. Until next year…

Oscar Commentary 2017: Final Predictions

oscar-644x362.jpgTomorrow night, the Oscars will be upon us for the 90th time, and the Academy seems to be doing everything in its power to reboot after a year’s worth of mishaps and mistakes on Hollywood’s part. And also of their own doing. While most people ended up throwing away their predictions for last year in a wild dumpster fire, this year seems to be both safer and harder to predict. There are obvious “safe” films that will likely win major awards, but then there seems to be a dark horse in every category (even the tech awards) that actually has a shot at taking home the gold. That’s what this final blog post on the 90th Academy Awards will focus on, predicting who will most likely win, as well as who could win. And just for the fun of it, I’ll throw in my own personal opinions on who should win.

War-apes.jpgBEST VISUAL EFFECTS

Will win: War for the Planet of the Apes

Could win: Blade Runner 2049

Should win: Blade Runner 2049

After the first two films in the rebooted Planet of the Apes franchise lost this one to Hugo and Interstellar, the third film comes out in a year where all the VFX nominees are blockbusters. The guilds favor the strides this franchise takes in motion capture technology, as do the Critics Choice Awards. But just as favored at the BAFTAs is Blade Runner 2049 and the creation of the dystopian future filled with Replicants and flying cars. Neither film has precedence winning the VFX Oscar (the original Blade Runner lost to E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial), so history will be made for one franchise or the other.

SOW000bBEST PRODUCTION DESIGN

Will win: The Shape of Water

Could win: Blade Runner 2049

Should win: The Shape of Water

A period piece set in the 1950s winning Best Production Design? Big shocker! While this would’ve been a fairly safe bet from the beginning, The Shape of Water has been cleaning up this category on the awards circuit. The guilds love it too, but also worth keeping in mind is that the guilds often have multiple sub-categories in which they can award other films. This year, it was Blade Runner 2049 that took those major subcategories and found its way to the Oscar nominees, though it may be a case where the nomination is its own reward.

PhantomThreadBEST COSTUME DESIGN

Will win: Phantom Thread

Could win: The Shape of Water

Should win: The Shape of Water

Being about fashion as it is, it should be no surprise that Phantom Thread has been cleaning house in this category. Every major voting body is falling head-over-heels in love with this one, with the exception of one major body that could end its big streak: the guild. They instead went over to The Shape of Water, which had better costuming in my opinion anyway in that you could tell in an instant where and when the film was set. One of the biggest issues with Phantom Thread is that you could never tell what location or decade the setting was, and you’d think the costumes would’ve done that. But if Daniel Day-Lewis doesn’t take home his fourth acting trophy, this would be the Academy’s way of honoring his supposed final performance.

darkest-hour.jpgBEST MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING

Will win: Darkest Hour

Could win: Victoria & Abdul

Should win: Darkest Hour

Everybody loves Gary Oldman in a fat suit, so I wholly expect Darkest Hour to win in this category. It doesn’t appear to be facing any strong competition, but Suicide Squad won this category last year, so anything is possible. With that being said, the most likely alternative would be Victoria & Abdul, which only has one other nomination. If the Academy wants to reward that film for something, this is a possibility. And while I did pick Darkest Hour as the “rightful” winner, it should be noted that I haven’t seen either of the other nominees, and I will never understand why Best Makeup and Hairstyling only has three nominees as opposed to five.

_0b2c1adc-322a-11e7-9a19-4de5eae5ad18BEST SOUND EDITING/MIXING

Will win: Dunkirk

Could win: Blade Runner 2049

Should win: Dunkirk

Dunkirk will most likely take home both sound awards, as it is heavily favored by the guilds and other voting groups like the Critics Choice Awards and the BAFTAs. And it should be, as the sound and score are so perfectly integrated into each other that it helps create a unique cinematic experience. But just as we discussed earlier, the guilds have sub-categories, and that’s where Blade Runner 2049 is building a lot of support. The Academy is known for their aversion to blockbusters, but we must remember upsets by Suicide SquadFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, and Mad Max: Fury Road in the technical categories, so there is the off-chance that Blade Runner 2049 could take home quite a few awards this year.

sphe-2210652-Full-Image_GalleryBackground-en-US-1504133250642._RI_SX940_BEST FILM EDITING

Will win: Baby Driver

Could win: Dunkirk

Should win: Dunkirk

Going into the awards season, everyone thought this was Dunkirk‘s to lose, as its non-linear editing structure kept the stories moving along until they intersected at an explosive crescendo. However, we then saw the film tie with Baby Driver at the Critics Choice Awards, and lose completely to that same film at the BAFTAs. The only saving grace for Dunkirk is the guild didn’t go for its strongest competition at all, but will it be enough to push it past the current frontrunner?

thumbnail_26214BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY

Will win: Blade Runner 2049

Could win: Dunkirk

Should win: Dunkirk

The Academy is notoriously adverse to blockbuster filmmaking, but they also love rewarding an overdue master, and that’s exactly what Roger Deakins is. Fourteen nominations in without a single win, Oscar would love to reward him for his efforts in some of his best work. That being said, the Academy is still adverse to blockbusters, so they could go looking for something else to reward. Dunkirk‘s entrancing experience is largely due to its cinematography, so don’t be too surprised if Roger Deakins loses yet another award. But as of now, this is the one category where Blade Runner 2049 is the undisputed frontrunner.

nullBEST ANIMATED FEATURE

Will win: Coco

Could win: The Breadwinner

Should win: Coco

Doubt Pixar at your peril. Outside of Monsters, Inc. and Cars, every nominee they’ve offered to Oscar has walked away winning, even the less-than-stellar ones (ahem, Brave). But again, sub-categories, and the Annie Awards do have a few of those, including one for independent animation. The Breadwinner managed to take home that one, but will it hold up against the studio power that keeps the champion’s belt in Pixar’s corner? Well, this is the same studio power that got a nomination for The Boss Baby, so…

Miguel_plays_Remember_MeBEST ORIGINAL SONG

Will win: “Remember Me” (Coco)

Could win: “This Is Me” (The Greatest Showman)

Should win: “Remember Me” (Coco)

This category loves animation. This category also loves Disney, which happens to specialize in animation and own Pixar. This category also loves a song that can have multiple meanings depending on who sings it, which is exactly what “Remember Me” is. But in a way, that’s also what “This Is Me” is, and this category also loves musicals. But The Greatest Showman has an uphill battle due to its mixed critical reception, which is largely in part due to the same meaning being derived from all of its songs that sound the same. Coco took one song and made it sound and feel different every time, and most of the precursor awards seems to agree. The Golden Globes went with “This Is Me”, but I feel like Disney has already acquired this one.

shape-of-waterBEST ORIGINAL SCORE

Will win: The Shape of Water

Could win: Dunkirk

Should win: Dunkirk

Yet another instance where The Shape of Water is drowning out the competition, it seems that there’s no stopping Alexandre Desplat from winning his second Oscar, his first being a surprise win for The Grand Budapest Hotel. But his first win was a surprise, so the same thing could happen to him this time around, and Dunkirk is taking home all the sound awards. Since its sound design is blended seamlessly with its score, there is a chance that Hans Zimmer could also take home his second Oscar, his first one being… The Lion King?!

syldcnsupyoq3z7zsp0hBEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

Will win: Call Me By Your Name

Could win: The Disaster Artist

Should win: The Disaster Artist

For some reason, Call Me By Your Name is winning this category in spades, which means I may be drunk by the time the ceremony is over. But it didn’t start out that way, as the National Board of Review gave this category to The Disaster Artist, which lost out on a highly-anticipated Best Actor nomination for James Franco. Since Call Me By Your Name is present in three other categories, it’s possible that the Academy may go for the film about Hollywood and reward The Disaster Artist in the only category it was nominated for. Or they’ll go for the one starring Armie Hammer as a gay pedophile, I don’t know. We’ll see how drunk I get tomorrow.

billboard2.jpgBEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

Will win: Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Could win: Get Out

Should win: The Shape of Water

This one has been in a little more turmoil, as what was perceived to be the frontrunner in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri was not nominated at the Writer’s Guild of America. It also lost at the Critics Choice Awards to Get Out, which later took home the top prize at the WGA. Unlike The Shape of WaterGet Out is not the strongest competitor for Best Picture, so this could be where the Academy decides to reward the horror-comedy written by Jordan Peele. But with the backing of the Golden Globes and the BAFTAs, as well as being a top contender for Best Picture, the safe bet would be Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.

Allison-Janney-1BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS

Will win: Allison Janney (I, Tonya)

Could win: Laurie Metcalf (Lady Bird)

Should win: Laurie Metcalf (Lady Bird)

Allison Janney has dominated this category just as she dominates I, Tonya. I don’t see that changing come Oscar Sunday, but the National Board of Review can still unveil a dark horse, and this year it was Laurie Metcalf. Janney is a dominating force with little range or development, though her performance is fantastic. Metcalf, on the other hand, is one of the driving forces of Lady Bird, and I would contend that the film wouldn’t be as good as it was without her nuanced performance. So when the competition is between nuance and domination, we’ll have to see which the Academy values more this year.

three-billboards-outside-ebbing-missouri-movie-sam-rockwellBEST SUPPORTING ACTOR

Will win: Sam Rockwell (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri)

Could win: Willem Dafoe (The Florida Project)

Should win: Willem Dafoe (The Florida Project)

Again, the National Board of Review went with Willem Dafoe. Again, this is the only category that recognized The Florida Project. And again, it may be shut out by a more high-profile film with an overdue actor. Unlike many overdue performers, Sam Rockwell would be winning for his first nomination, and his performance will certainly be one of the highlights of his career regardless. It also doesn’t hurt that he’s playing a racist cop with a three-dimensional arc. But how much of that is the actor versus the screenplay? And that’s why Willem Dafoe should be taken seriously as a dark horse.

thumbnail_26878BEST ACTRESS

Will win: Frances McDormand (Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri)

Could win: Meryl Streep (The Post)

Should win: Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water)

The #MeToo movement is one of the driving forces behind this year’s politically-charged Oscars, and that’s why Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri has become a force to be reckoned with. Despite winning an Oscar already for Fargo, Frances McDormand looks to be the frontrunner to take home the trophy this year. But despite comedic winners at the Golden Globes and Critics Choice like Saoirse Ronan (Lady Bird) and Margot Robbie (I, Tonya), the real dark horse is NBR’s pick: Meryl Streep. The Post was only recognized in this category and Best Picture, and in this anti-Trump age the Academy could look for a way to get Streep on stage and speak out against both the President and sexual harrassment. But let’s be honest, Sally Hawkins gave us a much more relatable character without ever saying a word.

skynews-gary-oldman-lily-james_4198191BEST ACTOR

Will win: Gary Oldman (Darkest Hour)

Could win: Daniel Day-Lewis (Phantom Thread)

Should win: Daniel Kaluuya (Get Out)

Everybody loves Gary Oldman in a fat suit. It’s reason for Darkest Hour to win for makeup, and it’s definitely reason for Gary Oldman to win Best Actor. James Franco (The Disaster Artist) would’ve been his only serious competition had he not been snubbed, so finding a dark horse here required me to grasp at straws. There’s honestly not a lot of buzz building around any of these actors, not even Daniel Kaluuya. But there is buzz about Daniel Day-Lewis presumably retiring from acting, so there’s a slim chance he takes this one as a parting gift. But for that performance that anyone could’ve done? As much as I disliked the movie, I think Oldman would be the more deserving of the two.

the_shape_of_water_btsBEST DIRECTOR

Will win: Guillermo del Toro (The Shape of Water)

Could win: Greta Gerwig (Lady Bird)

Should win: Guillermo del Toro (The Shape of Water)

NBR surprised us and went with Greta Gerwig. The Director’s Guild of America rewarded Jordan Peele (Get Out) as a first-time director. Both of their directing feats are nothing to scoff at, but Guillermo del Toro has been sweeping this category just as his film has in every other category it’s been leading in. I highly doubt that’ll change, especially since The Shape of Water is a strong contender for a number of other awards, including…

ThreeBillboards (1).jpgBEST PICTURE

Will win: Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Could win: The Shape of Water

Should win: The Shape of Water

This was tough at first, as for awhile there was no clear frontrunner. NBR went with The Post, the Golden Globes went with Lady Bird in comedy, Critics Choice picked Get Out for horror, Call Me By Your Name is dominating screenplay wins, and Phantom Thread surprised everyone just by being nominated. But amidst the ashes of violent competition, two frontrunners kept fighting until the very end. The Shape of Water won Critics Choice and the Producers Guild of America, and it’s the indisputable leader in the Best Director race. Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri took the Golden Globes and the BAFTAs, as well as the SAG Ensemble, so it’s currently the safe bet. But it still has to fight to win for its screenplay, and Martin McDonagh missing out on a Best Director nomination is a big deal as very few Best Picture winners have ever not been nominated for Best Director. It’s gonna be a photo finish just like last year, but our only saving grace is that maybe Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway will be given the correct envelope this time.

And that concludes my pre-Oscars commentary. I may write something on Monday to recap the actual winners, but these are my predictions going in. I’m curious to know what you think. Leave your thoughts in the comments section below, and may the best (or most heavily-marketed) movies win!

March Movie Madness 2018: Best Picture Oscar-Winning Films

Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 7.47.26 PMEverybody likes tournaments, right? Well I like tournaments, and I’ve noticed that people seem to love tournaments even more in March. I guess it has something to do with basketball, but my sports expertise is in football, hockey, and football. The other football. No, not that football, the OTHER football! You know, the one you’re not thinking abou- you know what, forget it. The point is, it’s tournament time, and this tournament shall last throughout all of March and be voted on by the one and only, you! The plural you, not the singu- whatever, you get it. It’s time to vote!

Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 7.47.40 PMSince the Oscars are being held in March instead of February this year, I’ve decided to theme this year’s March Movie Madness tournament around the Best Picture-winning films. Haven’t seen all of them? Well voting will last for a week each round, so you’ll have plenty of time to do your research. I’ve chosen sixty-four films for everyone to vote on for the first of six rounds, and separated them all into four brackets of sixteen. Now for the sake of getting this tournament started in a timely fashion, I will not include whatever wins Best Picture at the 90th Academy Awards to be held on Sunday, March 4. However, everything that won from 1927-2016 was up for consideration.

Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 7.47.50 PMThe links to the polls will be posted below for all of you to access. There will be one for each bracket to make voting a little simpler for you, and also so the brackets are easier for me to make without paying a ton of money to make them. I would also appreciate it greatly if you shared this blog post with your friends so they can vote too. As the saying goes, the more the merrier!

Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 7.48.01 PMSo what are we waiting for? The polls are open! Time to vote!

Bracket A: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CWN8KQS

Bracket B: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CW52QNY

Bracket C: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CSLNCWR

Bracket D: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CSD73S7

Oscar Commentary 2017: Ranking the Best Picture Winners (2007-2016)

There’s always a strong debate on whether the Oscars are truly relevant in showcasing the overall quality of a film, particularly with the Best Picture winner. This is especially true in recent years, as many have called the Academy’s recent choices “safe”. We could argue that all day, but I’d like to think that they’re still at least picking good movies, even if some of them haven’t aged well. With that being said, let’s take a look at the last ten movies to win Best Picture and see which ones have stood the test of time or faded away from public consciousness. I will also briefly leave my pick on what should have won that year out of the nominated films, so you won’t see mentions of such films as The Dark Knight or Drive, as they were not nominated. If you guys like it, I’ll see about doing this again next year with the upcoming Best Picture winner in mind. Until then, the list is as follows:

the-kings-speech-533x40010. The King’s Speech – This is the very definition of an inspirational film, and I do mean that in the best way. Colin Firth (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) gives the performance of his career as King George VI, finding all the best places to insert Bertie’s signature stammer in the screenplay. Under the hands of a more gutsy director, this could have been a true tour-de-force film that deserved to win Best Picture. But under the direction of Tom Hooper (Les Misérables), it just feels rather safe. However, despite it being at the bottom of my list, this is by no means a bad movie, and it still holds a special place in my heart as one of the tools I used to overcome my own stammer. Again, the very definition of an inspirational film, just not much beyond that.

Should have won: The Social Network

TheArtistMovie.jpg9. The Artist – Another safe movie, but there is a significant difference between The Artist and The King’s Speech, and that difference is what ultimately resulted in the former ranking higher on this list. Instead of being safe but inspirational like The King’s SpeechThe Artist lacks in inspiration but makes up for it by actually taking advantage of its craft. Okay, it doesn’t do that much, but this almost-completely silent film does have a couple jarring scenes with sound that are used to great effect, each showing the turmoil and development of its protagonist. The end result may not have been spectacular, but the ambition is definitely there. Sometimes, that’s enough to get you a leg up over someone else.

Should have won: Hugo

spotlight-review.png8. Spotlight – Most people might’ve forgotten that this movie won Best Picture. While that may be mostly because it came on the heels of Leonardo DiCaprio (Inception) finally winning an Oscar, I think part of the reason is how stale and unmoving it is. In some ways, that’s the film’s biggest weakness, as it’s hard to get invested in a story and characters when the story and characters themselves aren’t invested in the story and characters. But that may also be its biggest strength, as one of the major themes of the film is that the pedophile priests were in plain sight and everybody knew about them, but for one reason or another they were too afraid to say anything. Whichever way you look at it, this is definitely a film that lends itself to airing on TV, and I guess someone had the bright idea that it was meant for bigger things.

Should have won: The Revenant

poster-for-film-argo-e1354785600715.jpg7. Argo – This is the only reason I still consider Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri to be a prominent Best Picture contender this year, because very few movies have won Best Picture without even being nominated for Best Director. While many may attribute this to the film being about Hollywood swooping in and saving the day, let’s not forget that this is still a well-made thriller with some genuinely suspenseful sequences, particularly the opening raid on the American Embassy in Iran and a marketplace tour towards the end of the second act. My only real issue is that the supporting cast isn’t terribly memorable, and they’re the people who we’re supposed to care about whether or not they’re rescued. That’s why it’s not higher on this list, but it’s still worth a viewing or two nonetheless.

Should have won: Life of Pi

birdman-poster.jpg6. Birdman – Yet another film about Hollywood, though this one does take a bit of a stab at it. The theme of the film seems to be rebellion, and this is mostly shown through Riggan Thomson (Michael Keaton) and his daughter Sam (Emma Stone), the latter rebelling against her father who is rebelling against Hollywood and superhero films, each having provided a lot for the well-being of those under them in this rebel cycle. Basically, everybody’s biting the hand that feeds them, but the film also tries to show how that hand is also choking them, which makes us ask if either action is ever justified. The long-take (or illusion thereof) by cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki (Gravity) further illustrates this rebellion against the myriads of quick cuts seen in most superhero movies, and major props to the production designers for keeping the sets filled with something interesting to look at the entire time. While it may not soar like its title character, its wings are still powerful enough to get airborne.

Should have won: Boyhood

12-years-a-slave-poster-copy.jpg5. 12 Years a Slave – You all knew we were gonna get to this one sooner or later. You don’t want to talk about it, just like you didn’t want it to win. Well, I’m with you, but I’m the one writing this blog so we’re gonna talk about it anyway. This is a cold and unforgiving portrait of slavery in pre-Civil War America, even more so when Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) had tasted freedom his whole life. As painful as it is to watch, a lot of that is thanks to the actors and how much range they bring to their performances, particularly Chiwetel Ejiofor (The Martian) and Michael Fassbender (Inglourious Basterds). They prove that the calmest scenes can be just as unsettling as anything else when the setting is this relentlessly cruel. There, now that we’re done, we can be happy, right?

Should have won: The Wolf of Wall Street

130217moonlight.jpg4. Moonlight – It’s no mistake, Moonlight just barely missed out on the top three. As much as anyone can relate to this story, especially as someone who spent years living in and exploring South Florida, much of this film’s longevity will be because of the manner in which it was presented with the Best Picture Oscar. But while it may be too artsy for casual viewers’ tastes, it’s still a great film that tells a sprawling epic on an intimate scale. If you’ve been to South Beach, you immediately recognize it when one of the film’s key scenes begins there, even though it may look like just any other beach. It’s a film about a journey, which is what most movies are anyway, but this journey is unique to the character of Chiron and unique throughout cinema, and somehow we all saw ourselves in this journey. And that is no mistake.

Should have won: La La Land

DQmapHDoaoSMCFF2jEM7m9aXiSKU7anWGSeH7GXwsVd8da4.jpeg3. No Country for Old Men – Like Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem), we’re starting to creep into darker territory here, and also where the films become more deserving of a Best Picture win. While I would not have voted for it to win, this is still a fantastic effort by the then-overdue Coen Brothers (True Grit), who infused their signature wit into a lawless and desolate wasteland that makes the Old West look like a rompin’ good time. All of the actors give it their all, but it really is Javier Bardem (Skyfall) who steals the show and everything else out from under everyone. It’s the kind of movie that slowly stalks you after you’re done watching it and appears in your thoughts when you least expect it, even though you’ve been anticipating its arrival the whole time.

Should have won: There Will Be Blood

Slumdog-Millionaire.jpg2. Slumdog Millionaire – If we don’t count the two or three or four movies that should’ve been nominated for Best Picture that year but weren’t, the Academy made the right choice picking this movie. Even if we do count them, there’s still that argument to be made. Danny Boyle (127 Hours) doesn’t shy away from showing the darker side of the slums in India, but at the same time he borrows a few tactics from Bollywood filmmaking to craft this love story that spans across time, distance, and game shows. There are plenty of dark moments, but it’s ultimately satisfying at the end, and the music by A. R. Rahman (Lagaan) fits the mood throughout the entire film. It’s a feel good movie that gives you every reason and desire to feel good. Whether you think it’s outclassed or not, it’s still one for the ages.

Should have won: Slumdog Millionaire

hurt_locker_poster_m.jpg1. The Hurt Locker – Finally at the top, we come to one of the best and most challenging war films of the 21st Century, one whose screenplay runs with the traditional hero’s journey but then flips it on its head. Kathryn Bigelow (Zero Dark Thirty) understood what this script was going for, and had the film shot with as much realism in order to normalize the experience of war to the audience, which is exactly the perspective we need to be in to understand the decisions made by the protagonist. For him, war is the normal world, and this is important in understanding the character and the culture we live in where we have become so desensitized to war and violence that we can’t get enough of it, almost like an addiction that we rush back to every chance we get. It’s a haunting and realistically fresh take on familiar themes and stories, but that makes it all the better because of it, and that’s why it’s the best Best Picture winner of the last decade.

Should have won: The Hurt Locker

So what have we learned? Aside from a few outliers, the safe films did drift towards the bottom of the list, while the upper half was dominated by darker films. Even when we had moments of happiness in the top half or melancholy in the bottom half, it was still balanced out (and then some) by the dominating emotion of the film. But the better films are generally more challenging, whether they challenge the audience or the filmmaking craft. Having said that, all of these films are still worth a watch. Maybe you’ll get something out of them, maybe you won’t. They all seemed to have resonated with someone if they managed to win the title of Best Picture.

Oscar Commentary 2017: Superhero Movies

ww
Gal Gadot strides through No Man’s Land in Wonder Woman (2017).

Year after year, I hear this argument: why does the Academy not recognize popular films that people actually see? Well, the truth is they do. Best Picture nominees like Inception (2010), The Revenant (2015), The Lord of the Rings (2001-2003), and many others in recent years, were all massive box office hits for the time. In fact, there’s usually at least one Best Picture nominee that makes north of $400 million at the worldwide box office, and that’s nothing to scoff at. But the argument persists because the people making it mean something else entirely: why does the Academy never nominate superhero movies for major awards? Now if they asked this question instead of the former, they’d actually have ground to stand on. And this year especially, fans seemed ever more eager to see a superhero movie nominated for Best Picture, namely Logan or Wonder Woman. Alas, it didn’t happen, but should it happen?

Superman-The-Movie-2
Christopher Reeve flies through the skies in Superman (1978).

Now it’s important to note that while no superhero movie has ever been nominated for Best Picture, a few of them have been nominated for (and even won) Oscars in the past. Superman (1978), Spider-Man (2002) and Batman Begins (2005) were all nominated for technical awards like cinematography and editing; Spider-Man 2 (2004) and The Incredibles (2004) both took home some wins in the same year; and even Suicide Squad (2016) somehow managed to win an Oscar for Best Makeup and Hairstyling. I still don’t understand how that happened. But what about the major awards for acting and writing? Sure, the Marvel Cinematic Universe usually sneaks itself into the Best Visual Effects lineup, but it’s extremely rare to see a superhero movie nominated for what’s referred to as the “above-the-line” awards. You’d think characters who can leap tall buildings in a single bound would have a much easier time reaching those heights.

joker-batman-behind-scenes-the-dark-knight-10341805-1024-683-e1339674803620
Heath Ledger and Christian Bale interrogate each other in The Dark Knight.

Again, it has happened. Just this year, Logan was nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay. The aforementioned The Incredibles was nominated for Best Original Screenplay. And lest we forget, The Dark Knight (2008) was a monster at the nominations that year, scoring eight nominations and two wins, including a posthumous Best Supporting Actor award for Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker. So my initial argument will be focused on these three films, particularly what makes them stand out against other superhero films. Everyone’s talked about why The Dark Knight is the best in its genre, so I won’t say too much about it. It really did elevate the genre to a new level, not just in quality, but by blending it with other genres. It’s not just an action, but also a crime drama and a political thriller. The ensemble cast includes businessmen, politicians, and beat cops, all of whom are entangled in the rivalry between Batman and the Joker while still trying to uphold peace in one of the most chaotic cities on Earth. With themes of order, chaos, fairness, and humanity in play with the main cast members, it’s no wonder fans were outraged when Christopher Nolan’s take on the Batman mythos wasn’t a bigger hit with the Academy than it was.

lbyihbgwjmo42iinn3wi.jpg
The good old days are reminisced in The Incredibles (2004).

What about The Incredibles? It won a couple Oscars, including Best Animated Feature. Okay, that’s not surprising for a Pixar film, but it does go to show how talented the storytellers at Pixar are at creating layered stories that appeal to adults while still being accessible to children. Remember how a man attempts to commit suicide in the first five minutes? And then five minutes later sues Mr. Incredible for thwarting said suicide attempt? Yeah, this was dark even for Pixar. But among many more adult themes, the core story is about a middle-aged man going through a mid-life crisis. That man just so happens to have superhuman strength. Logan has similar themes with regard to age, which is fitting since it’s the last time we’ll ever see Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart as Wolverine and Professor X. Here, both of these characters that we’ve seen in glory and dignity for almost twenty years have been broken down by the ravages of time, suffering from Alzheimer’s, failing immune systems, and crushed souls after all of their loved ones have passed on. Going back to genre-bending, it also functions as a western set in a dystopian future. The main characters, once again, happen to be superpowered beings that we know and love.

download (4)
Patrick Stewart and Hugh Jackman grow weary of the other’s comfort in Logan.

So we know that The Incredibles got its shot thanks to the power of Pixar, and Logan may have only gotten its screenplay nod thanks to a weak year for movies based on pre-existing source material, but how close did they get to Best Picture nods? Well, I’d say a lot of these films and others got pretty close. Logan was selected as one of the ten best films of the year by the National Board of Review. The IncrediblesThe Dark KnightWonder Woman, and others were all on similar lists by the American Film Institute. And along with Deadpool (2016), those three were also nominated for the top prize at the Producers Guild of America, the winner of which usually going on to win Best Picture at the Oscars. A lot of the films I’ve mentioned here have done something different from other superhero films, whether it’s Wonder Woman as a period piece about the innate goodness of humanity or Deadpool as a screwball comedy making fun of other superhero tropes.

maxresdefault-1
Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, Jeremy Renner, Robert Downey Jr., and Mark Ruffalo assemble for a money shot in The Avengers (2012).

As close as they’re getting, why have we yet to see a superhero film score a Best Picture nod at the Oscars? Many might cite the demographics of the Academy voters and that most of them are old white men. Some bring up the “prestige factor” that comes with the Oscars, which are often referred to as the Super Bowl of movies. One might even call it stupidity, and there’s plenty of that going around in the Academy regardless of what superhero movie didn’t get a nomination this year. All of these arguments have some merit to them. But if you want my take on it, and I assume you do since you’re reading this article, I think it’s because most superhero movies aren’t good enough for Best Picture recognition. There are a few I would’ve nominated. I still say The Dark Knight and The Avengers (2012) were the best films of their respective years, and I’d even make arguments for X-Men (2000), Watchmen (2009), and a couple others. But most of the time, they still have noticeable flaws.

Azure-Terror-Towers-05
Michael B. Jordan and Dane DeHaan reach for new heights in Chronicle (2012).

No movie is perfect. And while it’s true that superhero movies take more risks on a technical level than most other films do, 1) most of that has to do with their insanely high production budgets, and 2) not all of the risks pay off. Whether it’s noticeably bad CGI, silly-looking costumes, uneven pacing as a result of introducing audiences to a completely different world that’s kinda still our own but not really, there’s a lot to poke fun at despite how good many of them are. And in a competitive race like the Oscars, voters are more likely to lean towards something that got everything right than something that swung for all the pitches but got two strikes and three balls. But the genre is also still very young, at least as far as the mainstream appeal is. While we got big screen takes of Superman and Batman in the 80s, almost all of the current success of the superhero genre has been in the 2000s and beyond, and almost entirely within two properties: Marvel and DC. The genre needs to branch out and tell other stories before it can win over Academy voters, and I think it’s on the right path to doing that. Logan and The Dark Knight are perfect examples of that within the major properties, so imagine what more niche properties can do on a narrative level. I’d love to see another movie like Chronicle (2012), and more than that I’d love to see it be so good it’s a frontrunner for Best Picture. But until the genre matures, I think it’ll be awhile before a movie achieves that kind of superpower.

Oscar Commentary 2017: LGBTQ Cinema

landscape-1505307489-call-me-by-your-name.jpg
Timotheé Chalamet and Armie Hammer star in Call Me By Your Name, nominated for four Oscars: Best Picture, Best Actor (Chalamet), Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Original Song (“Mystery of Love”).

We see it pretty much every year. A movie about a gay or lesbian couple gets nominated for a bunch of Oscars. Some say it’s a touching portrait of romance that hasn’t been explored yet, but is that true anymore if we see these films at the Oscars every single year? Some say they keep getting nominated because it’s the politically-correct thing to do, but should the artistry behind many of these films be denied? Some say they’re just good movies, but are they all really? And do all of them actually get major nominations?

151118-bugbee-carol-tease_e2x3bg
Rooney Mara and Cate Blanchett were nominated for Oscars for their work in Carol, which was also nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Original Score, Best Cinematography, and Best Costume Design.

And this brings me to my first argument about the subject matter: Carol (2015). If you saw this movie, you know this much to be certain: Cate Blanchett commands every scene with confidence and grace and makes everyone of either sex fall in love with her, Rooney Mara perfectly captures the innocence of a young woman discovering her sexuality, and everything about the production from the cinematography to the set and costume design creates a bleak but colorful world that encapsulates 1950s America. In short, this is a great movie that deserves more praise than it got. So, why was it snubbed of a Best Picture nomination over lesser films like Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) (more on that piece of trash another time. I said another time!)? If politics had anything to do with it, it would’ve gotten the nomination for sure. But I have a different theory that might also explain why so many LGBTQ films have been getting nominations in the last decade: the sliding scale system.

maxresdefault (8)
Annette Bening and Julianne Moore star in The Kids Are Alright, nominated for four Oscars: Best Picture, Best Actress (Bening), Best Supporting Actor (Mark Ruffalo), and Best Original Screenplay.

I’ll try to make this short, mostly because even the best accountants I know could never explain this no matter how hard they tried, but there’s a lot of math that comes from the Best Picture ballots of each Academy voter that determines the number of Best Picture nominees between five and ten. It usually changes every year. My point is, instead of allowing more blockbuster films like The Dark Knight (2008) to make the cut, it has incentivized studios to launch even more rigorous Oscar campaigns for smaller movies that might otherwise not make any money at the box office. And while I don’t have access to the exact numbers for Oscar voting, I can offer analysis based on what other nominations many of these movies are getting.

the-danish-girl-eddie-redmayne-alicia-vikander
Alicia Vikander and Eddie Redmayne were nominated for Oscars for their work in The Danish Girl, with the former winning Best Supporting Actress.

For example, while Carol was not nominated for Best Picture, it was recognized for Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara in Best Actress and Supporting Actress respectively, the latter being a bull$#!% move if you ask me (more on that when it’s relevant). That same year, we also saw The Danish Girl (2015) nominated for Best Actor for Eddie Redmayne, and winning Best Supporting Actress for Alicia Vikander (more bull$#!%). Also a LGBTQ film, also not nominated for Best Picture. And both films fought hard with their campaigns on the precursor awards, with Carol especially dominating many nomination counts. What ultimately happened was the sliding scale set the Best Picture count to eight, shutting both films out.

dbc-fp-082213-0318_wide-523535abed8cb4ec007ca4a92f201b47002419d8-s900-c85
Jared Leto won Best Supporting Actor for Dallas Buyers Club, which also won Best Actor (Matthew McConaughey) and Best Makeup and Hairstyling.

So that’s what happens when the sliding scale shuts out LGBTQ films entirely. What about when they do get nominated for Best Picture? Films like Dallas Buyers Club (2013) and Call Me By Your Name (2017) cover similar subject matter and made the Best Picture cut, both in years where there were nine nominees. What does this have to do with anything? A lot, actually. Best Picture is the only category that is able to have more than five nominees, and the one category that almost always ties itself to Best Picture is Best Director. Especially in the age of the sliding scale, if your film is nominated for Best Director, it’s most likely nominated for Best Picture as well. What’s interesting to note is that while the aforementioned films, along with The Kids Are Alright (2010), were nominated for Best Picture in their respective years, they all missed out on Best Director. Which means the sliding scale was probably the only reason these films got in. So, does it ever actually happen for LGBTQ films to make it big at the Oscars? Well, yes.

1028screeningmoonlight01
Moonlight won Oscars for Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor (Mahershala Ali), and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Once-in-awhile you’ll see this kind of movie get nominated for most of the major awards, and maybe even win Best Picture like Moonlight (2016). But it should also be noted that not only did Barry Jenkins lose Best Director to Damien Chazelle for La La Land (2016), the film arguably also capitalized on the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag that had been going around for a couple years prior, and here comes a film about a poor gay black kid from Miami that takes all the gold. If there’s one thing the Academy loves more than a socially-relevant topic, it’s multiple socially-relevant topics. There’s also The Imitation Game (2014), securing nominations for Best Picture and Best Director, and just like the aforementioned Moonlight, winning Best Adapted Screenplay. But that was also a WWII movie which, again, Oscar campaigns can’t get enough of. Seriously, Dunkirk (2017) AND Darkest Hour (2017)? Do we really need both in the same year?

imitation-game.jpg
Keira Knightley and Benedict Cumberbatch were nominated for Oscars for The Imitation Game, which won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay.

But one other thing that those two films have in common is they take more advantage of the art and science of filmmaking than, say, Call Me By Your NameThe Imitation Game is edited together like a puzzle that you have to solve, the order of each flashback or flashforward planned very carefully so the story still flows organically and reveals come naturally to both the audience and the other characters. Moonlight took risks in its cinematography and music, using a cerebral tone to get its audience into Chiron’s mindset. While I don’t think all of its risks paid off (ex. slo-mo reverse shot), it still went above and beyond the generic shot composition most films of its type would’ve attempted.

1483984758_focus_features_brokeback_mountain_heath_ledger_jake_gyllenhaal_anne_hatheway_michelle_williams_bg3
Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger were nominated for Oscars for Brokeback Mountain, which won Best Original Score, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Director (Ang Lee).

And going back years further before the sliding scale, you see these films less and less, with the occasional nominations and wins for films like Brokeback Mountain (2005), Milk (2008), and Philadelphia (1993). But that was back when we still only had five nominees for Best Picture, and also when the subject was far more controversial than it is today. So, what can we gather from all this? That politics has everything to do with these films getting nominations, but also nothing at all. Campaigns are everything, but the current system is so screwed up that the politics are either completely obvious and/or don’t matter. The LGBTQ community can say they have victory by getting Best Picture nominated films, but they really don’t mean much when they’re obviously included just to fill a quota. Seriously though, what was up with snubbing Carol?